<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Have You Heard? Noobing Has Changed!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://faithsloan.com/2009/01/24/have-you-heard-noobing-has-changed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://faithsloan.com/2009/01/24/have-you-heard-noobing-has-changed/</link>
	<description>... I Approve This Money ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 07:57:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Faith</title>
		<link>http://faithsloan.com/2009/01/24/have-you-heard-noobing-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faithsloan.com/?p=359#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Jen, in the past, the incentives percentages were indeed high enough for me to continue promoting the program.

But yes, you are right. Today, we receive .06% which is a real bottom. Yesterday we received .21 and .16 the previous day.

We were getting consecutive days of 3%.

Here are some numbers to take a look at:
1/19/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.2653%)
1/18/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.2010%)
1/17/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (2.1121%)
1/16/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (3.0000%)

I am unsure of the formula Noobing uses to calculate the daily reviewer payment percentages but the wide disparity from the 16th to the 19th and even today leaves me speechless.

I know of no advertising venue which has such huge daily fluctuations in revenue. But what do I know?

God Bless
Faith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jen, in the past, the incentives percentages were indeed high enough for me to continue promoting the program.</p>
<p>But yes, you are right. Today, we receive .06% which is a real bottom. Yesterday we received .21 and .16 the previous day.</p>
<p>We were getting consecutive days of 3%.</p>
<p>Here are some numbers to take a look at:<br />
1/19/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.2653%)<br />
1/18/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.2010%)<br />
1/17/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (2.1121%)<br />
1/16/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (3.0000%)</p>
<p>I am unsure of the formula Noobing uses to calculate the daily reviewer payment percentages but the wide disparity from the 16th to the 19th and even today leaves me speechless.</p>
<p>I know of no advertising venue which has such huge daily fluctuations in revenue. But what do I know?</p>
<p>God Bless<br />
Faith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://faithsloan.com/2009/01/24/have-you-heard-noobing-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faithsloan.com/?p=359#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I joined Noobing 12 days ago.  I have a couple things to share with those either thinking about Noobing or are already participating.  Traffic - sure they send traffic to your site, but this is NOT &quot;quality&quot; traffic. Your CTR is going to be very low, compared to organic traffic.  No one sent to your site by Noobing wants to go to your site - they are not taken there naturally! In fact, this artificial manner to drive traffic may violate some of the Alexa ranking algorithms.

The daily incentives are low, dangerously low.  Here is what I mean by this.  Say you purchase  $500 in ad credits.  That&#039;s a $500 non-refundable, one-time payment.  If you are looking at this from a pseudo investment, certainly, you would like to recoup that $500 or better yet, get something extra - like a small return in one year - that&#039;s the definition of investment.  Since you the $500 has no collateral, you need to think hard about this lack of incentive control, read on...

Think about this.  In order to get the $500 back in one year, and assuming that every 15 days you roll your daily earnings back into ad credits without taking out a dime for one year, your MINIMUM daily average pay out percentage CAN NOT be lower than 0.2%. If you take .2% x 365, you get 73% but don&#039;t forget  you are compounding, so your principal amount invested over one year will be more than $500.  Folks, that&#039;s just to make your money back in one year.

I am not investing in Noobing for the traffic/advertisement part of the business. Paying 33 cents per visit is very expensive - the industry pricing calls for 59 cents per thousand visits - that&#039;s the standard.  Just my 2 cents. 

If Noobing can guarantee an average daily return of .22% for one year, I would pop 50K into this business right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I joined Noobing 12 days ago.  I have a couple things to share with those either thinking about Noobing or are already participating.  Traffic &#8211; sure they send traffic to your site, but this is NOT &#8220;quality&#8221; traffic. Your CTR is going to be very low, compared to organic traffic.  No one sent to your site by Noobing wants to go to your site &#8211; they are not taken there naturally! In fact, this artificial manner to drive traffic may violate some of the Alexa ranking algorithms.</p>
<p>The daily incentives are low, dangerously low.  Here is what I mean by this.  Say you purchase  $500 in ad credits.  That&#8217;s a $500 non-refundable, one-time payment.  If you are looking at this from a pseudo investment, certainly, you would like to recoup that $500 or better yet, get something extra &#8211; like a small return in one year &#8211; that&#8217;s the definition of investment.  Since you the $500 has no collateral, you need to think hard about this lack of incentive control, read on&#8230;</p>
<p>Think about this.  In order to get the $500 back in one year, and assuming that every 15 days you roll your daily earnings back into ad credits without taking out a dime for one year, your MINIMUM daily average pay out percentage CAN NOT be lower than 0.2%. If you take .2% x 365, you get 73% but don&#8217;t forget  you are compounding, so your principal amount invested over one year will be more than $500.  Folks, that&#8217;s just to make your money back in one year.</p>
<p>I am not investing in Noobing for the traffic/advertisement part of the business. Paying 33 cents per visit is very expensive &#8211; the industry pricing calls for 59 cents per thousand visits &#8211; that&#8217;s the standard.  Just my 2 cents. </p>
<p>If Noobing can guarantee an average daily return of .22% for one year, I would pop 50K into this business right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faith</title>
		<link>http://faithsloan.com/2009/01/24/have-you-heard-noobing-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faithsloan.com/?p=359#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Kim, first of all Noobing is in the business of providing an advertising platform which has been extremely effective for me in terms of marketing, branding, promotions and finally conversion.

In terms of our daily site reviewer  payment percentates, here is what I have:
===
1/27/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.0836%)
1/26/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.0562%)
1/25/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.7280%)
1/24/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.1476%)
1/23/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.2532%)
1/22/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.4383%)
1/21/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.7104%)
1/20/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.2770%)
1/19/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.2653%)
1/18/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.2010%)
1/17/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (2.1121%)
=====

for the last 7 days or 1 week, we have received 2.42% reviewer payments on the non-refundable purchase price of our ads.

If we extrapolate that to be 20 weeks or approximately 5 months, then the average would be 48.35% of our purchases paid out to us in our pockets just for looking at and reviewing our peers&#039; advertisements.

So if you purchase  $1000.00 of advertisements, then in 5 months, you will have not only had your advertisements seen and reviewed many times, but you would have received &lt;b&gt;$483.50&lt;/b&gt; for simply doing a task equivalent to watching television commercials for a few minutes of your day.

So there you are, Kim! LOL! So what do you think? Hope that helps. It looks like a win-win situation to me.

On the other hand, they can give us 4% each and every day and since NO business can sustain that, they would be out of business before we can sneeze and say &quot;Ahhhh Choooo!&quot;.

I am for longevity. This is no fly by night autosurf at all.

By the way, I will be driving to Kansas City, MO in a coupla weeks. They are about 11 or so miles from where I will be so I plan to drop in on them to demand some fine wine and most excellent par for the course dining. Will keep you posted.

&lt;h1&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.noobing.com/?sid=1648&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GO NOOBING!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;

God Bless
Faith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim, first of all Noobing is in the business of providing an advertising platform which has been extremely effective for me in terms of marketing, branding, promotions and finally conversion.</p>
<p>In terms of our daily site reviewer  payment percentates, here is what I have:<br />
===<br />
1/27/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.0836%)<br />
1/26/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.0562%)<br />
1/25/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.7280%)<br />
1/24/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.1476%)<br />
1/23/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.2532%)<br />
1/22/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.4383%)<br />
1/21/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.7104%)<br />
1/20/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.2770%)<br />
1/19/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.2653%)<br />
1/18/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (0.2010%)<br />
1/17/2009	Site Reviewer Payment (2.1121%)<br />
=====</p>
<p>for the last 7 days or 1 week, we have received 2.42% reviewer payments on the non-refundable purchase price of our ads.</p>
<p>If we extrapolate that to be 20 weeks or approximately 5 months, then the average would be 48.35% of our purchases paid out to us in our pockets just for looking at and reviewing our peers&#8217; advertisements.</p>
<p>So if you purchase  $1000.00 of advertisements, then in 5 months, you will have not only had your advertisements seen and reviewed many times, but you would have received <b>$483.50</b> for simply doing a task equivalent to watching television commercials for a few minutes of your day.</p>
<p>So there you are, Kim! LOL! So what do you think? Hope that helps. It looks like a win-win situation to me.</p>
<p>On the other hand, they can give us 4% each and every day and since NO business can sustain that, they would be out of business before we can sneeze and say &#8220;Ahhhh Choooo!&#8221;.</p>
<p>I am for longevity. This is no fly by night autosurf at all.</p>
<p>By the way, I will be driving to Kansas City, MO in a coupla weeks. They are about 11 or so miles from where I will be so I plan to drop in on them to demand some fine wine and most excellent par for the course dining. Will keep you posted.</p>
<h1><a href="http://www.noobing.com/?sid=1648" rel="nofollow">GO NOOBING!</a></h1>
<p>God Bless<br />
Faith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Petersen</title>
		<link>http://faithsloan.com/2009/01/24/have-you-heard-noobing-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faithsloan.com/?p=359#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Faith,

Do you know what is going on with Noobing?  Rebates are down to almost nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faith,</p>
<p>Do you know what is going on with Noobing?  Rebates are down to almost nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
